<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic RE: Need some help with EAPS rings design in Network Architecture &amp; Design</title>
    <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/network-architecture-design/need-some-help-with-eaps-rings-design/m-p/12739#M143</link>
    <description>Hi Ron thankf for information, I have made a version 2 of my design where I have made new connectiont that I think are possible, removed some shared ports and delete R13 and show information about Masters, Controllers and Partners . &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
My doubt is about RING 6 (SW2-SW3-SW4-SW13) it will works fine? Or Id better ask for new connection with Sw5 or SW3 to make a new Ring?, apart from this, the rest of the topology is it ok?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;P class="fancybox-image"&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="db9a99715502499992a11ce66afc99e7_RackMultipart20161031-103193-11wg9n2-EAPS_Planned_v2_inline.jpg"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/596i8A82893E92312787/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="db9a99715502499992a11ce66afc99e7_RackMultipart20161031-103193-11wg9n2-EAPS_Planned_v2_inline.jpg" alt="db9a99715502499992a11ce66afc99e7_RackMultipart20161031-103193-11wg9n2-EAPS_Planned_v2_inline.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2016 16:23:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Edison</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-10-31T16:23:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Need some help with EAPS rings design</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/network-architecture-design/need-some-help-with-eaps-rings-design/m-p/12737#M141</link>
      <description>Hi, I need some help with EAPS rings design. My network is working now as the next image shows.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;P class="fancybox-image"&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="abde2d71b3724ff4b5ab1749a82aea65_RackMultipart20161031-82579-6qt0j8-Recent_EAPS_inline.jpg"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/582i398DABDCCFE363CB/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="abde2d71b3724ff4b5ab1749a82aea65_RackMultipart20161031-82579-6qt0j8-Recent_EAPS_inline.jpg" alt="abde2d71b3724ff4b5ab1749a82aea65_RackMultipart20161031-82579-6qt0j8-Recent_EAPS_inline.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
In the last months we have implemented some redundancy links but  not yet with EAPS rings, and now I want to do it because we have many clients that we give to them Layer 2 service and EAPS would help us a lot with the service quality. The physical connections are like the next image I show.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;P class="fancybox-image"&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="abde2d71b3724ff4b5ab1749a82aea65_RackMultipart20161031-38415-8igggb-Physical_Connection_inline.jpg"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/5346i5EC28704AD33313E/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="abde2d71b3724ff4b5ab1749a82aea65_RackMultipart20161031-38415-8igggb-Physical_Connection_inline.jpg" alt="abde2d71b3724ff4b5ab1749a82aea65_RackMultipart20161031-38415-8igggb-Physical_Connection_inline.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
In the topology I show some switches BDCOMs that support also EAPS rings,I made a test that it works with Extremes but if any of you have experienced please share it with me. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I have designed  other rings and I have divided Original ring 3 into ring 3 and ring 13, changing some Licenses of course. I showed this design int the last picture. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I havent found exact information about limitation of EAPS, I remember that I received a training and the teacher told us of a specific topology that EAPS cant work in, I dont remember how it was, so I want to ask you about the possibility of implementing the topology I am planning, , especially RING 8 and RING 9, If not possible I cant ask to change  the liks to connect to another switch. All the switchs are located in different places.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;P class="fancybox-image"&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="abde2d71b3724ff4b5ab1749a82aea65_RackMultipart20161031-5763-pllrs9-EAPS_Planned_inline.jpg"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/3915iFD1335E48538B8CC/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="abde2d71b3724ff4b5ab1749a82aea65_RackMultipart20161031-5763-pllrs9-EAPS_Planned_inline.jpg" alt="abde2d71b3724ff4b5ab1749a82aea65_RackMultipart20161031-5763-pllrs9-EAPS_Planned_inline.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks in advance.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2016 10:22:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/network-architecture-design/need-some-help-with-eaps-rings-design/m-p/12737#M141</guid>
      <dc:creator>Edison</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-10-31T10:22:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: Need some help with EAPS rings design</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/network-architecture-design/need-some-help-with-eaps-rings-design/m-p/12738#M142</link>
      <description>This is an interesting design. &lt;BR /&gt;
There are a couple of rules that apply and what we need to know is where you place the "master secondary ports" for all the separate rings. &lt;BR /&gt;
The main blocking issue is the fact that there can be up to two shared ports per switch.&lt;BR /&gt;
In switch SW-2, I count 5 shared ports. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;A href="http://documentation.extremenetworks.com/exos/exos_21_1/eaps/r_eaps-shared-port-configuration-rules.shtml" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener"&gt;http://documentation.extremenetworks.com/exos/exos_21_1/eaps/r_eaps-shared-port-configuration-rules....&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The following page will show you the allowed topology possibilities:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;A href="http://documentation.extremenetworks.com/exos/EXOS_21_1/EAPS/c_additional-common-link-topology-examples.shtml" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener"&gt;http://documentation.extremenetworks.com/exos/EXOS_21_1/EAPS/c_additional-common-link-topology-examp...&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I hope that this will help you a bit in the right direction.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2016 16:23:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/network-architecture-design/need-some-help-with-eaps-rings-design/m-p/12738#M142</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ron_Huygens</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-10-31T16:23:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: Need some help with EAPS rings design</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/network-architecture-design/need-some-help-with-eaps-rings-design/m-p/12739#M143</link>
      <description>Hi Ron thankf for information, I have made a version 2 of my design where I have made new connectiont that I think are possible, removed some shared ports and delete R13 and show information about Masters, Controllers and Partners . &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
My doubt is about RING 6 (SW2-SW3-SW4-SW13) it will works fine? Or Id better ask for new connection with Sw5 or SW3 to make a new Ring?, apart from this, the rest of the topology is it ok?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;P class="fancybox-image"&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="db9a99715502499992a11ce66afc99e7_RackMultipart20161031-103193-11wg9n2-EAPS_Planned_v2_inline.jpg"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/596i8A82893E92312787/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="db9a99715502499992a11ce66afc99e7_RackMultipart20161031-103193-11wg9n2-EAPS_Planned_v2_inline.jpg" alt="db9a99715502499992a11ce66afc99e7_RackMultipart20161031-103193-11wg9n2-EAPS_Planned_v2_inline.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2016 16:23:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/network-architecture-design/need-some-help-with-eaps-rings-design/m-p/12739#M143</guid>
      <dc:creator>Edison</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-10-31T16:23:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: Need some help with EAPS rings design</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/network-architecture-design/need-some-help-with-eaps-rings-design/m-p/12740#M144</link>
      <description>I think that this should work. I didn't checked all of the possible options but at first sight I now don't see any rule violations.&lt;BR /&gt;
Make sure that none of the secondary ports point to an EAPS shared ports. &lt;BR /&gt;
Basically Ring 6 is similar to Ring 5 and 8 with only one extra switch.&lt;BR /&gt;
I see a brown dotted line between switch 2 and 5. I think that should no be there, right?&lt;BR /&gt;
If possible, before deploying this, I should say that you perform a good couple of different fail-over tests to validate the different scenarios. &lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2016 16:23:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/network-architecture-design/need-some-help-with-eaps-rings-design/m-p/12740#M144</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ron_Huygens</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-10-31T16:23:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: Need some help with EAPS rings design</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/network-architecture-design/need-some-help-with-eaps-rings-design/m-p/12741#M145</link>
      <description>Hi Edison, are you planning to use a shared vlan (data/protected vlan) among all those EAPS Rings?</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2016 16:23:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/network-architecture-design/need-some-help-with-eaps-rings-design/m-p/12741#M145</guid>
      <dc:creator>Henrique</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-10-31T16:23:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: Need some help with EAPS rings design</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/network-architecture-design/need-some-help-with-eaps-rings-design/m-p/12742#M146</link>
      <description>Ron, yes that brown dotted line shouldnt be there, I correct that and I add a new ring. I show the picture under this lines. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;P class="fancybox-image"&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="ada2b2bf9b684868ad1dd6d04942a1b3_RackMultipart20161101-129384-1bw9y9c-EAPS_Planned_v2_inline.jpg"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/598i6DC92385F3A0FDCC/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="ada2b2bf9b684868ad1dd6d04942a1b3_RackMultipart20161101-129384-1bw9y9c-EAPS_Planned_v2_inline.jpg" alt="ada2b2bf9b684868ad1dd6d04942a1b3_RackMultipart20161101-129384-1bw9y9c-EAPS_Planned_v2_inline.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Hi Henrique only ring 13 and Ring 9 are for particular clients , so if it's necessary and possible  I would use  protecteds vlan among all the other rings.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
So I going to make tests, I will try to share my experience.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2016 16:23:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/network-architecture-design/need-some-help-with-eaps-rings-design/m-p/12742#M146</guid>
      <dc:creator>Edison</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-10-31T16:23:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: Need some help with EAPS rings design</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/network-architecture-design/need-some-help-with-eaps-rings-design/m-p/12743#M147</link>
      <description>Hi Edison, yes it's possible. I would recommend you to use a LAG (if possible) for all shared ports. That will minimize any controller action if the common-link fails since you would have a LAG with 2 ports.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2016 16:23:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/network-architecture-design/need-some-help-with-eaps-rings-design/m-p/12743#M147</guid>
      <dc:creator>Henrique</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-10-31T16:23:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

