<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic anomaly Ports in Network Architecture &amp; Design</title>
    <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/network-architecture-design/anomaly-ports/m-p/14388#M1792</link>
    <description>I have many Extreme switch type Summit X450-24x DC. with software version 15.31.4 patch1-38. when i dive command #show port anomaly . i got on many value . which mean that? Is this value affect the performance of the network? If yes? How can I fix it?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;P class="fancybox-image"&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="ab0653e982394585acbfbc4a5c39732b_RackMultipart20160225-99253-bfdnzk-anomaly_inline.jpg"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/4056i937FCCA35C8F6790/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="ab0653e982394585acbfbc4a5c39732b_RackMultipart20160225-99253-bfdnzk-anomaly_inline.jpg" alt="ab0653e982394585acbfbc4a5c39732b_RackMultipart20160225-99253-bfdnzk-anomaly_inline.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2016 15:45:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>MUNIR_ENG</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-02-25T15:45:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>anomaly Ports</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/network-architecture-design/anomaly-ports/m-p/14388#M1792</link>
      <description>I have many Extreme switch type Summit X450-24x DC. with software version 15.31.4 patch1-38. when i dive command #show port anomaly . i got on many value . which mean that? Is this value affect the performance of the network? If yes? How can I fix it?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;P class="fancybox-image"&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper" image-alt="ab0653e982394585acbfbc4a5c39732b_RackMultipart20160225-99253-bfdnzk-anomaly_inline.jpg"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/4056i937FCCA35C8F6790/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="ab0653e982394585acbfbc4a5c39732b_RackMultipart20160225-99253-bfdnzk-anomaly_inline.jpg" alt="ab0653e982394585acbfbc4a5c39732b_RackMultipart20160225-99253-bfdnzk-anomaly_inline.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2016 15:45:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/network-architecture-design/anomaly-ports/m-p/14388#M1792</guid>
      <dc:creator>MUNIR_ENG</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-02-25T15:45:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: anomaly Ports</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/network-architecture-design/anomaly-ports/m-p/14389#M1793</link>
      <description>That is just the "Rx Pkt Count" = receive paket count = packets that are incoming on the port.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
All other counters on the right in the section "Anomaly Violation" are 0 = no problem.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2016 15:49:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/network-architecture-design/anomaly-ports/m-p/14389#M1793</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ronald_Dvorak</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-02-25T15:49:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: anomaly Ports</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/network-architecture-design/anomaly-ports/m-p/14390#M1794</link>
      <description>thank you</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2016 15:49:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/network-architecture-design/anomaly-ports/m-p/14390#M1794</guid>
      <dc:creator>MUNIR_ENG</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-02-25T15:49:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

