<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic RE: spanning tree protocol in Network Architecture &amp; Design</title>
    <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/network-architecture-design/spanning-tree-protocol/m-p/15027#M2275</link>
    <description>As Oscar, I'd say that is a result of Wireshark using names for MAC addresses. Thus this seems to be related to STP, while it just uses the same MAC address. The line shown above clearly shows a PFC frame, not an STP BPDU. To confirm this, you can drill into the frame data inside Wireshark.</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2016 23:31:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Erik_Auerswald</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-12-01T23:31:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>spanning tree protocol</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/network-architecture-design/spanning-tree-protocol/m-p/15025#M2273</link>
      <description>I have disabled spanning tree everywhere on vlans, interfaces yet when i generate PFC pause frames some spanning tree packets are also captured. Can anybody help me how to turn them off.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
following is the capture of wireshark:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
0.045006 ExtremeN_97:e6:79 Spanning-tree-(for-bridges)_01 MAC Control MAC CTRL 64 MAC CLASS BASED FLOW CONTROL PAUSE Spanning-tree-(for-bridges)_01 ExtremeN_97:e6:79&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2016 17:33:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/network-architecture-design/spanning-tree-protocol/m-p/15025#M2273</guid>
      <dc:creator>Danial_Jalil</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-12-01T17:33:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: spanning tree protocol</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/network-architecture-design/spanning-tree-protocol/m-p/15026#M2274</link>
      <description>PFC pause frames are also send to the same dmac as STP, 01:80:c2:00:00:01 so I think wireshark accidently sees these as STP.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2016 17:56:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/network-architecture-design/spanning-tree-protocol/m-p/15026#M2274</guid>
      <dc:creator>OscarK</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-12-01T17:56:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: spanning tree protocol</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/network-architecture-design/spanning-tree-protocol/m-p/15027#M2275</link>
      <description>As Oscar, I'd say that is a result of Wireshark using names for MAC addresses. Thus this seems to be related to STP, while it just uses the same MAC address. The line shown above clearly shows a PFC frame, not an STP BPDU. To confirm this, you can drill into the frame data inside Wireshark.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2016 23:31:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/network-architecture-design/spanning-tree-protocol/m-p/15027#M2275</guid>
      <dc:creator>Erik_Auerswald</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-12-01T23:31:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: spanning tree protocol</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/network-architecture-design/spanning-tree-protocol/m-p/15028#M2276</link>
      <description>Thank you for your help guys!&lt;B&gt;@Oscar&lt;/B&gt;&lt;B&gt;@Erik&lt;/B&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2016 16:26:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/network-architecture-design/spanning-tree-protocol/m-p/15028#M2276</guid>
      <dc:creator>Danial_Jalil</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-12-05T16:26:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

