<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic RE: FlowRedirection Based Transparent Web Cache Redirection? in Network Architecture &amp; Design</title>
    <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/network-architecture-design/flowredirection-based-transparent-web-cache-redirection/m-p/12853#M257</link>
    <description>Wow so basically the configuration above should be able to drop in replace the WCCP from cisco?</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2015 19:43:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Chris1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-07-10T19:43:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>FlowRedirection Based Transparent Web Cache Redirection?</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/network-architecture-design/flowredirection-based-transparent-web-cache-redirection/m-p/12851#M255</link>
      <description>We're currently using a Cisco for WCCP Redirection of HTTP traffic to a cache server (ISP)&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
We have 2x MLAG x670 for our Core that feed into that Cisco, as you can see now we have a point of failure which we don't like and it's EOL, and not 10G)&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
What i was wondering is cant we just do an ACL (flowredirection?) on both of our MLAG'd core switches to redirect dst-port 80 to go to the Cache Server IP instead of routing directly to the internet.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
For instance....&lt;BR /&gt;
Port 1 customerVLAN (plus others that i dont want to get proxied) (various subnets)&lt;BR /&gt;
Port 2 wanVLAN (gateway 10.0.0.1)&lt;BR /&gt;
Port 3 cacheVLAN (cache 10.0.1.1)&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
create flow-redirect ToProxy&lt;BR /&gt;
configure flow-redirect ToProxy add nexthop 10.0.1.1 priority 100&lt;BR /&gt;
configure flow-redirect ToProxy add nexthop 10.0.0.1 priority 200&lt;BR /&gt;
configure flow-redirect ToProxy health-check ping&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
allhttp.pol&lt;BR /&gt;
entry allhttp {&lt;BR /&gt;
if {&lt;BR /&gt;
protocol tcp;&lt;BR /&gt;
source-address 100.100.100.0/24; (whatever our customers subnet is)&lt;BR /&gt;
destination-port 80; (only for internet hosted websites, not customer served)&lt;BR /&gt;
} then {&lt;BR /&gt;
redirect-name ToProxy;&lt;BR /&gt;
count WebHTTP;&lt;BR /&gt;
 }&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
configure access-list allhttp vlan customerVLAN ingress&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
That way it would use the proxy if it's up but if we have a crash on our cache server it would fallback to the lower priority nexthop (default gateway) until the proxy server is restored?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Would this have a negative impact on our x670's or the routing performance, I don't think it would as from my reading through the manuals the ACL's are done on the ASIC's at linerate? IS their something i should specifically be watching out for? Will we run into issues as with substantial traffic getting redirected/notredirected)</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2015 01:55:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/network-architecture-design/flowredirection-based-transparent-web-cache-redirection/m-p/12851#M255</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-10T01:55:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: FlowRedirection Based Transparent Web Cache Redirection?</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/network-architecture-design/flowredirection-based-transparent-web-cache-redirection/m-p/12852#M256</link>
      <description>You are right, this has no impact as ACL and redircted traffic will be handled by the ASIC at wirespeed.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2015 11:35:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/network-architecture-design/flowredirection-based-transparent-web-cache-redirection/m-p/12852#M256</guid>
      <dc:creator>OscarK</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-10T11:35:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: FlowRedirection Based Transparent Web Cache Redirection?</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/network-architecture-design/flowredirection-based-transparent-web-cache-redirection/m-p/12853#M257</link>
      <description>Wow so basically the configuration above should be able to drop in replace the WCCP from cisco?</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2015 19:43:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/network-architecture-design/flowredirection-based-transparent-web-cache-redirection/m-p/12853#M257</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chris1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-10T19:43:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: FlowRedirection Based Transparent Web Cache Redirection?</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/network-architecture-design/flowredirection-based-transparent-web-cache-redirection/m-p/12854#M258</link>
      <description>I guess that it does not replace WCCP because it does not keep user session to proxy (in case you have multiple proxy servers)</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2015 19:43:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/network-architecture-design/flowredirection-based-transparent-web-cache-redirection/m-p/12854#M258</guid>
      <dc:creator>Brunno_Lopes</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-10T19:43:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

