<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic What is the recommended solution for collapsed core SMB network? in Network Architecture &amp; Design</title>
    <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/network-architecture-design/what-is-the-recommended-solution-for-collapsed-core-smb-network/m-p/76113#M2605</link>
    <description>I am working on a solution for a revamp of small office network that has the following requirement:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;OL&gt; 
&lt;LI&gt;3 nos 48-port POE Edge switch 
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Redundant Core 
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;All switches reside in the same rack 
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;All copper connectivity 
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;They will be using VMWare ESX Cluster (2 servers with 4 NIC cards used for connectivity) 
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;They have a Fortinet firewall connected to the redundant core 
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;There will be other servers connected to the core like NVRs, PBX etc.  
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;
The competition is proposing Cisco 2960 switches in the edge and 2 nos 3750 swtiches in the core. Since 3750 doesnt support VSS Stacking I guess they will be stacked and all connectivity will use standard etherchannel. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Being more familiar with the ERS and VSP switches my go to design was ERS 3600 series on the edge and 2 nos VSP 4850 in the core. Since the VSPs can't be stacked, it will have to be an SMLT design. I don't see the need for using SPB here. So simple IST and SMLT configuration. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
My question is : is this the recommended solution for small setups like this (especially price-competitiveness wise)? Or is there another solution using EXOS switches that might make more sense. Would like to hear your thoughts.</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2019 16:19:56 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>philipdj</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-04-17T16:19:56Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>What is the recommended solution for collapsed core SMB network?</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/network-architecture-design/what-is-the-recommended-solution-for-collapsed-core-smb-network/m-p/76113#M2605</link>
      <description>I am working on a solution for a revamp of small office network that has the following requirement:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;OL&gt; 
&lt;LI&gt;3 nos 48-port POE Edge switch 
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Redundant Core 
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;All switches reside in the same rack 
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;All copper connectivity 
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;They will be using VMWare ESX Cluster (2 servers with 4 NIC cards used for connectivity) 
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;They have a Fortinet firewall connected to the redundant core 
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;There will be other servers connected to the core like NVRs, PBX etc.  
&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;
The competition is proposing Cisco 2960 switches in the edge and 2 nos 3750 swtiches in the core. Since 3750 doesnt support VSS Stacking I guess they will be stacked and all connectivity will use standard etherchannel. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Being more familiar with the ERS and VSP switches my go to design was ERS 3600 series on the edge and 2 nos VSP 4850 in the core. Since the VSPs can't be stacked, it will have to be an SMLT design. I don't see the need for using SPB here. So simple IST and SMLT configuration. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
My question is : is this the recommended solution for small setups like this (especially price-competitiveness wise)? Or is there another solution using EXOS switches that might make more sense. Would like to hear your thoughts.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2019 16:19:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/network-architecture-design/what-is-the-recommended-solution-for-collapsed-core-smb-network/m-p/76113#M2605</guid>
      <dc:creator>philipdj</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-17T16:19:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

