<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Failover between two DC's in Network Architecture &amp; Design</title>
    <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/network-architecture-design/failover-between-two-dc-s/m-p/85436#M2666</link>
    <description>Hi Matthew,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
have you tried to use BFD to speed up OSPF convergence, i.e., time to detect a failed neighbor (Metro-E indicates that you have a Layer 2 service and currently use OSPF directly between your DC devices)? If you have several E-Lines instead of one E-LAN you could consider point-to-point link-type configuration to possibly speed up OSPF convergence.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Perhaps you could benefit from using OSPF areas, if you are concerned with two many routes affected by a failure in the other DC, or just to keep events localized in one DC if possible.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I am not yet convinced that the added complexity of using two routing protocols with redistribution is needed, but then I do not know much about your situation and what you have tried already.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Why do you think that using iBGP would speed up convergence? You seem to have an idea what it shall accomplish.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;
Erik</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2019 15:11:27 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Erik_Auerswald</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-09-12T15:11:27Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Failover between two DC's</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/network-architecture-design/failover-between-two-dc-s/m-p/85435#M2665</link>
      <description>Hi Folks,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I currently have 2 DC's that are in the same geographic region along with several remote sites. All locations are connected via private Metro-E service with L3 connectivity (OSPF). &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I am considering running iBGP w/OSPF redistribution to speed up failover between our DC sites, but would like any suggestions or comments regarding a DC-DR failover. The end goal being complete failover between DC-DR</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jul 2019 22:46:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/network-architecture-design/failover-between-two-dc-s/m-p/85435#M2665</guid>
      <dc:creator>MLD</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-19T22:46:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Failover between two DC's</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/network-architecture-design/failover-between-two-dc-s/m-p/85436#M2666</link>
      <description>Hi Matthew,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
have you tried to use BFD to speed up OSPF convergence, i.e., time to detect a failed neighbor (Metro-E indicates that you have a Layer 2 service and currently use OSPF directly between your DC devices)? If you have several E-Lines instead of one E-LAN you could consider point-to-point link-type configuration to possibly speed up OSPF convergence.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Perhaps you could benefit from using OSPF areas, if you are concerned with two many routes affected by a failure in the other DC, or just to keep events localized in one DC if possible.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I am not yet convinced that the added complexity of using two routing protocols with redistribution is needed, but then I do not know much about your situation and what you have tried already.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Why do you think that using iBGP would speed up convergence? You seem to have an idea what it shall accomplish.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;
Erik</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2019 15:11:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/network-architecture-design/failover-between-two-dc-s/m-p/85436#M2666</guid>
      <dc:creator>Erik_Auerswald</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-12T15:11:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Failover between two DC's</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/network-architecture-design/failover-between-two-dc-s/m-p/85437#M2667</link>
      <description>&lt;USER-MENTION data-id="8167008"&gt;@Erik Auerswald&lt;/USER-MENTION&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I was also considering multi-area OSPF to keep failures localized (as you stated). Our E-LAN is a mesh so the p2p configuration is not possible at this time. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I was considering iBGP as a future proof configuration, in the event that we start to expand to different regions and to speed up failure. However, the BFD with multi-area ospf might be a better option at the moment. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks for your reply.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2019 18:41:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/network-architecture-design/failover-between-two-dc-s/m-p/85437#M2667</guid>
      <dc:creator>MLD</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-12T18:41:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

