<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic RE: 220-switches stacking in Network Architecture &amp; Design</title>
    <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/network-architecture-design/220-switches-stacking/m-p/12932#M336</link>
    <description>Hi, all!&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Can we use 51-52 ports of 220-48t-10GE4 as data-ports, when 49-50 - as stack-ports?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thank you!</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2018 12:36:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Alexandr_P</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-08-23T12:36:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>220-switches stacking</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/network-architecture-design/220-switches-stacking/m-p/12929#M333</link>
      <description>Hello, everybody,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
There are several questions about 220's stacking:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
1) Could I stack 24 and 48 ports models?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
2) Is the 10GB-C01-&lt;BR /&gt;
SFPP right cable model for 220 switches?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
3) Do I need 4 cables for four switches, right?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
4) Would it be the classical full-ring stack?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
5) What is the top speed possible for stacking like this?  20Gbps?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
6) Am I right that there are no dedicated stack ports on the back and I should use SFP+ ports?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Many thanks in advance,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Ilya&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
P.S.Does it really have CISCO Cli instead of awesome EXOS?)))&lt;BR /&gt;
P.P.S And may I have some manual for these new switches?</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2017 14:14:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/network-architecture-design/220-switches-stacking/m-p/12929#M333</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ilya_Semenov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-09-29T14:14:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: 220-switches stacking</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/network-architecture-design/220-switches-stacking/m-p/12930#M334</link>
      <description>Ilya:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
1) Could I stack 24 and 48 ports models?&lt;BR /&gt;
Yes.  One item to note is that stacking is done via the front-pane SFP+ ports, and the 12 &amp;amp; 24 port models only have 2 SFPs - hence when stacking these units you would not have any uplinks on the 12 or 24 port units - uplinks from the stack would need to come from a 48p unit.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
2) Is the 10GB-C01-&lt;BR /&gt;
SFPP right cable model for 220 switches?&lt;BR /&gt;
Yes - that is the 1M cable - you can also use the 10GB-C03-SFPP - which is a 3M cable is further distance is needed.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
3) Do I need 4 cables for four switches, right?&lt;BR /&gt;
Yes - you want to connect a stack in a ring topology - 1 to 2, 2 to 3, 3 to 4, and 4 back to 1&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
4) Would it be the classical full-ring stack?&lt;BR /&gt;
Yes.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
5) What is the top speed possible for stacking like this?  20Gbps?&lt;BR /&gt;
correct.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
6) Am I right that there are no dedicated stack ports on the back and I should use SFP+ ports?&lt;BR /&gt;
Correct - as mentioned above, stacking is done via the SFP+ ports.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The 200 series runs the FASTPATH network operating system and does have a different CLI to that of EXOS.  It is one that should be familiar to those that have worked with Cisco products in the past.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
As to manuals - you can download the 200 Series manuals at - &lt;A href="http://www.extremenetworks.com/support/documentation/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener"&gt;http://www.extremenetworks.com/support/documentation/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Scroll down to the "Extreme Switching - Software" section and expand on "200 Series"&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2017 18:37:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/network-architecture-design/220-switches-stacking/m-p/12930#M334</guid>
      <dc:creator>Michael_Ward</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-09-29T18:37:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: 220-switches stacking</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/network-architecture-design/220-switches-stacking/m-p/12931#M335</link>
      <description>Thanks a lot, Michael!</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2017 18:37:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/network-architecture-design/220-switches-stacking/m-p/12931#M335</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ilya_Semenov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-09-29T18:37:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RE: 220-switches stacking</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/network-architecture-design/220-switches-stacking/m-p/12932#M336</link>
      <description>Hi, all!&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Can we use 51-52 ports of 220-48t-10GE4 as data-ports, when 49-50 - as stack-ports?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thank you!</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2018 12:36:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/network-architecture-design/220-switches-stacking/m-p/12932#M336</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alexandr_P</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-23T12:36:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

