<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Suggestion for structured CLI in Wired Access</title>
    <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/wired-access/suggestion-for-structured-cli/m-p/120799#M28</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I decided to post this in the developer forum because looked appropriate.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I recently had the joy of writing python code for XIQ-SE and EXOS. They tried to extract data from cli and automate ZTP+ with commands not available in XIQ-SE alone and required by my deployments.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Writing any code like this is mostly straighforward except for one thing: the massive amount of time, and code that goes to writing and debugging regular expressions to read the CLI output.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As a suggestion that would reduce this friction point, I had a look at the &lt;A href="https://www.nushell.sh/" target="_self"&gt;nuShell project&lt;/A&gt; and their effort to create a 'structured shell'. I mean a shell whose output is readable by humans but also structured so it can be easily parsed by programs.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think this would greatly help amateur coders like me write simple code to EXOS without having to&amp;nbsp; become regular expressions ninjas.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I hope Extreme would consider this in order to enhance adoption of coding and automation practices in&amp;nbsp; their OSes&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2025 14:51:34 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Salva_ferrer</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-11-19T14:51:34Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Suggestion for structured CLI</title>
      <link>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/wired-access/suggestion-for-structured-cli/m-p/120799#M28</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I decided to post this in the developer forum because looked appropriate.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I recently had the joy of writing python code for XIQ-SE and EXOS. They tried to extract data from cli and automate ZTP+ with commands not available in XIQ-SE alone and required by my deployments.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Writing any code like this is mostly straighforward except for one thing: the massive amount of time, and code that goes to writing and debugging regular expressions to read the CLI output.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As a suggestion that would reduce this friction point, I had a look at the &lt;A href="https://www.nushell.sh/" target="_self"&gt;nuShell project&lt;/A&gt; and their effort to create a 'structured shell'. I mean a shell whose output is readable by humans but also structured so it can be easily parsed by programs.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think this would greatly help amateur coders like me write simple code to EXOS without having to&amp;nbsp; become regular expressions ninjas.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I hope Extreme would consider this in order to enhance adoption of coding and automation practices in&amp;nbsp; their OSes&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2025 14:51:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.extremenetworks.com/t5/wired-access/suggestion-for-structured-cli/m-p/120799#M28</guid>
      <dc:creator>Salva_ferrer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-11-19T14:51:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

