Is the 64-bit image of HiveManager classic V8.2r2e damaged?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎07-09-2019 10:16 AM
I downloaded it but when I try to do the update Hivemanager says: "The image file is invalid. It might be damaged or was not officially released by Aerohive."
When I try to unzip it gzip says: "unexpected end of file".
I downloaded it twice but with no success.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎07-12-2019 11:20 AM
I did "tar tvzf hivemanager-8.2r2e-64b.signed4.tar.gz" and got a list of filenames and the message "gzip: stdin: invalid compressed data--format violated
tar: Unerwartetes Dateiende im Archiv.
tar: Error is not recoverable: exiting now"
When I do "gunzip hivemanager-8.2r2e-64b.signed4.tar.gz" the file becomes uncompressed and it says "gzip: hivemanager-8.2r2e-64b.signed4.tar.gz: decompression OK, trailing garbage ignored". The resulting tar-file can be extracted without any problems.
I tried the update of Hivemanager ....
and ....
it worked!
Thank you!
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎07-11-2019 04:37 PM
Okay I've heard back from that team and they tell me it should be fixed now, thank you very much for your patience. Can you tell me if you're still having issues with that file?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎07-11-2019 01:08 PM
Thank you for letting me know. Rather than have you try again in a few hours, I'm going to reach out to the team replacing that file directly and I'll let you know when they've given us the all clear to try again. I appreciate you keeping me updated.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎07-11-2019 08:33 AM
Hello Sam,
I just tried the most recent version: Same behavior as with the first version. I compared the first image with the third one: They are identical.
