Best practices for shared MAC on MLAG peers?
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-31-2018 04:09 PM
Creating an MLAG between two 440-G2's. The ISC will be an LACP of ports 15 and 16 and if I understand it, this LACP link must have a static MAC assigned on both sides of the ISC (on each peer). Is there a recommendation in terms of the MAC to use (do you just make one up)?
Also, mostly out of curiosity - there's a note about downstream LACP switches (one port to each peer) that discusses ensuring that the MLAG ports (ISC LAG) be configured as LACP too (which I'm doing). It reads as though this is a required config (I can't use a single 10Gb ISC connection). What's the reason? Is it because of the shared MAC issue too? Thanks!
Also, mostly out of curiosity - there's a note about downstream LACP switches (one port to each peer) that discusses ensuring that the MLAG ports (ISC LAG) be configured as LACP too (which I'm doing). It reads as though this is a required config (I can't use a single 10Gb ISC connection). What's the reason? Is it because of the shared MAC issue too? Thanks!
7 REPLIES 7
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-01-2018 10:05 AM
I guess it all boils down to the fact the the ISC is really nothing more than a normal LACP trunk to which the ISC VLAN is connected and across which the peer is defined, along with other VLAN's that are needed to support the "cross-core" LACP connections? Does that pretty much sum it up?
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-01-2018 10:05 AM
That is a correct conclusion.
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-01-2018 09:57 AM
You also need to enable LACP on the MLAG ports in SW1 and SW2
MLAG Port SW1
en mlag port 1:1 peer "core-sw2” id 1
en sharing 1:1 group 1:1 algorithm address-based L3_L4 lacp
MLAG Port SW2
en mlag port 1:1 peer "core-sw1" id 1
en sharing 1:1 group 1:1 algorithm address-based L3_L4 lacp
MLAG Port SW1
en mlag port 1:1 peer "core-sw2” id 1
en sharing 1:1 group 1:1 algorithm address-based L3_L4 lacp
MLAG Port SW2
en mlag port 1:1 peer "core-sw1" id 1
en sharing 1:1 group 1:1 algorithm address-based L3_L4 lacp
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
06-01-2018 09:57 AM
Thanks Ron. Missed that. So even though each switch is only singly connected you still need LACP to make the LAG work. I was thinking that somehow the MLAG port definition inherently did that, but then I guess it wouldn't work for different (non LACP) LAG types. Cool and - thanks!
