IPv6 BGP network advertisement
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎11-16-2016 04:03 PM
Hi Experts
Getting error while trying to advertise IPv6 routes in BGP peering. IPv4 works fine, but getting error in IPv6. The below network is preset in IPv6 routing table and shows as being directly connected.
(vr Test) SwitchA # configure bgp add network address-family ipv6-unicast fd01:976a:14fd:e7c0::/68
Error: vr Test: IPv6 network is not valid, must be a global unicast address and not a unique local address
Getting error while trying to advertise IPv6 routes in BGP peering. IPv4 works fine, but getting error in IPv6. The below network is preset in IPv6 routing table and shows as being directly connected.
(vr Test) SwitchA # configure bgp add network address-family ipv6-unicast fd01:976a:14fd:e7c0::/68
Error: vr Test: IPv6 network is not valid, must be a global unicast address and not a unique local address
9 REPLIES 9
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎11-16-2016 06:41 PM
Hi
Please see below:-
ExtremeXOS version 21.1.2.14
Please see below:-
ExtremeXOS version 21.1.2.14
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎11-16-2016 04:52 PM
Hi Sumanta, based on the error message you should add a Global Unicast Address.
GUA is currently defined by IPv6 prefix 2000::/3 which gives you the range below:
2000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000 to 3fff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff
ULA is currently defined by IPv6 prefix FC00::/7 which gives you the range below:
fc00:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000 to fdff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff
GUA is currently defined by IPv6 prefix 2000::/3 which gives you the range below:
2000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000 to 3fff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff
ULA is currently defined by IPv6 prefix FC00::/7 which gives you the range below:
fc00:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000 to fdff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎11-16-2016 04:27 PM
Your netmask, /68, is that a typo?
Because I think that /64 is the smallest size you can advertise via routing protocols.
I'm also not sure what happens when you use private V6 networks (the ones starting with fd) and put them in BGP. Part of me says it should work, but I've never tried it. Just like I've never tried putting "192.168.1.0" into BGP.
Frank
Because I think that /64 is the smallest size you can advertise via routing protocols.
I'm also not sure what happens when you use private V6 networks (the ones starting with fd) and put them in BGP. Part of me says it should work, but I've never tried it. Just like I've never tried putting "192.168.1.0" into BGP.
Frank
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎11-16-2016 04:27 PM
well, if it is IGP -- why not? BGP announcements between internal routers
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎11-16-2016 04:18 PM
This example does not shed much light about LUA or GUA?
https://gtacknowledge.extremenetworks.com/articles/Solution/Bgp-ipv6-networks-not-transmitted-to-bgp...
https://gtacknowledge.extremenetworks.com/articles/Solution/Bgp-ipv6-networks-not-transmitted-to-bgp...
