09-24-2021 01:27 PM
Hy,
we have the following setup in our company
Two x590 stacks “TOP” and “BOTTOM” as CORE switches
Two X440G2 stacks as copper Switches for Management devices “ILO, IDRAC, etc”
Is the sharing algorithm important on the MLAG ISC port?
https://extremeportal.force.com/ExtrArticleDetail?an=000079895&q=how%20to%20configure%20mlag
If not specified it uses L2 default - can this be a problem?
The sharing used for connection the x440g2 stacks is also lacp layer2
We experience congestion on core switches and on the copper switches X440G2. What can cause congestion on that setup?
We also see a problem on the X440G2 stacks that have very hiqh HAL process usage.
There is no direct problem, but we keep thinking something is not right.
All switches run 30.7.2.1
BR
10-13-2021 01:34 AM
10-12-2021 11:57 AM
09-28-2021 04:51 PM
Hi Anton,
I see you have three questions. Does the ISC sharing algorithm matter? How to look into congestion, and why is HAL high?
For the ISC sharing algorithm question. Assuming your diagram is complete, as long as you have all MLAG ports up between DC1 and DC2 there should be very little traffic on the ISC. You will see MLAG control traffic and BUM traffic.
Algorithm scenario:
Let’s say that Stack top’s MLAG ports to DC2 goes down. With the ports down any traffic that is hashed from the Left 440-g2 to the Stack-TOP will have to go across the ISC to be forwarded to DC2. Think about the traffic you would see and make your decision from there.
For congestion. Where are you see it? At the port? Any port errors or pause frames being received?
How high is HAL on the x440-G2?
Maybe this? Q A: Why do I see a high CPU utilization of process HAL on EXOS 22.x? | Extreme Portal (force.com)
Hope this helps,
Stephen Williams