Load sharing rules in stack (X670V & X460)
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎07-26-2018 07:01 AM
Hi Team, in a stack with X670V and X460 stacking like this :
Slot-1 X670V-48x X670V-48x Operational 64
Slot-2 X670V-48x X670V-48x Operational 64
Slot-3 X460-48x X460-48x Operational 54
Slot-4 X460-48x X460-48x Operational 54
I want to do a sharing only on slot 1 & 2 (X670V), LACP LAG with "address-based L3_L4 lacp" algorithm, I can't have 16 selected links, only 8 selected and 8 standby.
Is this limitation due to the X460 ?
regards
Sebastien
Slot-1 X670V-48x X670V-48x Operational 64
Slot-2 X670V-48x X670V-48x Operational 64
Slot-3 X460-48x X460-48x Operational 54
Slot-4 X460-48x X460-48x Operational 54
I want to do a sharing only on slot 1 & 2 (X670V), LACP LAG with "address-based L3_L4 lacp" algorithm, I can't have 16 selected links, only 8 selected and 8 standby.
Is this limitation due to the X460 ?
regards
Sebastien
3 REPLIES 3
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎08-07-2018 11:17 AM
thanks for replies
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎07-30-2018 05:49 PM
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎07-26-2018 09:40 AM
I think this is a horrible idea!
Every aspect of the the 670s is going to be limited by the capacity of the 460s. Keep it as two stacks so you get your moneys worth out of the 670s.
As for your question, I do not know the answer. I have never tried to create a 16 port lag.
Good luck
Every aspect of the the 670s is going to be limited by the capacity of the 460s. Keep it as two stacks so you get your moneys worth out of the 670s.
As for your question, I do not know the answer. I have never tried to create a 16 port lag.
Good luck
