Error: ACL install operation failed - filter hardware full for vlan esn-mo-01, port *
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-13-2016 12:33 PM
Hi there,
I'm trying to implement a new egress vlan ACL to match traffic going to a particular address on a range of UDP ports and put it into QoSprofile QP6.
But I'm getting the above error.
I'm on an X460 running 15.6.3.1 and I appear to have egress ACL slices available:
show access-list usage acl-slice port 1
Ports 1-34
Stage: INGRESS
[snip]
Stage: EGRESS
Slices: Used: 0 Available: 4
Slice 0 Rules: Used: 0 Available: 0
Slice 1 Rules: Used: 0 Available: 0
Slice 2 Rules: Used: 0 Available: 0
Slice 3 Rules: Used: 0 Available: 0
Stage: LOOKUP
Slices: Used: 1 Available: 3
Slice 0 Rules: Used: 0 Available: 0
Slice 1 Rules: Used: 0 Available: 0
Slice 2 Rules: Used: 0 Available: 0
Slice 3 Rules: Used: 35 Available: 477 system
Stage: EXTERNAL
Slices: Used: 0 Available: 0
I've found the 'fix' to reset the precedence to 'shared' as it now defaults to 'dedicated', but why should I? This ACL didn't exist on any previous version of code so why can't I use the default setting to apply this relatively simple ACL?
https://extremeportal.force.com/ExtrArticleDetail?an=000077652
Many thanks,
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-13-2016 01:38 PM
qosprofile qosprofilename—Forwards the packet to the specified QoS profile.
• ingress—all platforms
• egress—does not forward the packets to the specified qosprofile. If the action modifier “replace- dot1p” is present in the ACL rule, the dot1p field in the packet is replaced with the value from associated qosprofile.
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-13-2016 01:24 PM
"Depending on the platform you are using, traffic in an ACL traffic group can be processed as follows:
• Assigned to an ingress meter for rate limiting
• Marked for an egress QoS profile for rate shaping <<<<<<
• Marked for an egress traffic queue for rate shaping <<<<<<<
• Marked for DSCP replacement on egress
• Marked for 802.1p priority replacement on egress
• Assigned to an egress meter for rate limiting"
Is that incorrect? Should I be using an Ingress ACL on the incoming Vlan to assign my traffic to an appropriate QP?
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
05-13-2016 01:16 PM
