AP650 redundant links or aggregate

[jason_simmons]

Both Ethernet interfaces on our AP650's are connected to multi-gig switchports. Knowing that only ETH0 is capable of 2.5G, should I configure the interfaces as an aggregate or redundant?

How should I configure the switchports for each mode?

[samantha_lynn]

Thank you for your patience, I reviewed the data with our experts and they asked that we open a technical support case to move forward with this issue.

[jason_simmons]

Sorry for the delayed response. I think this is a switch, configured as a virtual chassis issue and not the AP, but I attached the tech data you wanted. Here's what I've discovered.

I ran all these test on the multi-gig ports on the switch except for the last one. I also connected both ports on an AP630 to the multi-gig ports and it worked as expected.

No VC + default config + Eth0 = pass

No VC + default config + Eth0 & Eth1 = pass

No VC + basic config + Eth0 = pass

No VC + basic config + Eth0 & Eth1 = pass

VC + default config + Eth0 = pass

VC + default config + Eth0 & Eth1 = fail

VC + default config + Eth0 & Eth1 on gig switchports = fail

[samantha_lynn]

Thank you for that information. Are these APs the only devices connected to that switch? Also could you send me tech data from one of the APs? There are a few things I'd like to check in that data. This guide reviews how to get tech data from the CLI of the AP: https://thehivecommunity.aerohive.com/s/article/Collecting-Tech-Data-via-CLI

[jason_simmons]

Running JunOS version 18.4R1-S2.4.