05-18-2021 01:00 PM
Hello,
today I played around with the built-in packet capture of EXOS ( How To: How to perform a local packet capture on an EXOS switch | Extreme Portal (force.com) )
I’m able to capture packets and open the pcap file with wireshark, but I only see the following packets:
Wondering if I’m doing something wrong or if the feature is something else than I’m thinking. Any hints?
Best regards
Stefan
Solved! Go to Solution.
05-18-2021 03:54 PM
Hi,
You can use the editcap tool to remove the first 52 bytes. Mine looked something like below from Powershell:
PS C:\Program Files\Wireshark> .\editcap.exe -C 52 editcap.pcap newpcap.pcap
syntax below:
PS C:\Program Files\Wireshark> .\editcap.exe -C 52 <original pcap filename> <new pcap filename>Below is more on editcap:
https://www.wireshark.org/docs/man-pages/editcap.html
Before:
After:
Thanks,
Chris Thompson
2 weeks ago - last edited 2 weeks ago
This is an interesting question because the built-in packet capture feature can be a bit confusing at first. If you're only seeing those packets in Wireshark, it may be related to the capture point, applied filters, or hardware offloading rather than the traffic itself. Checking the interface configuration and testing with a known traffic Gomovies flow could help narrow down the cause. I'd be interested to know what the final solution was, as it could be useful for anyone troubleshooting EXOS packet captures in the future.
05-18-2021 05:13 PM
Hi Chris,
this worked like a charm, thank you very much! How much “trouble” some 52 bytes can cause… 🙂
Maybe this little information can be added to the GTAC articles?
Best regards
Stefan
05-18-2021 03:54 PM
Hi,
You can use the editcap tool to remove the first 52 bytes. Mine looked something like below from Powershell:
PS C:\Program Files\Wireshark> .\editcap.exe -C 52 editcap.pcap newpcap.pcap
syntax below:
PS C:\Program Files\Wireshark> .\editcap.exe -C 52 <original pcap filename> <new pcap filename>Below is more on editcap:
https://www.wireshark.org/docs/man-pages/editcap.html
Before:
After:
Thanks,
Chris Thompson
Monday - last edited Monday
It sounds like the packet capture itself is working since you're able to open the PCAP in Wireshark, but the limited traffic suggests the capture point or filter may not be where you expect it to be. Himovies On EXOS, local packet captures can have certain limitations depending on the interface, VLAN, ASIC offloading, or whether the traffic is hardware-switched rather than CPU-bound.
03-17-2026 09:56 AM - edited 03-17-2026 09:57 AM
From what you described, it sounds like the packet capture itself is working, since you’re able to export the pcap file and open it in Wireshark. When only a limited or unusual set of packets appears, Flixer it’s often related to where the capture is attached or what traffic actually passes through that point on the switch.
03-16-2026 10:31 AM - edited 03-16-2026 10:31 AM
from what you’re describing, it doesn’t sound like you’re doing anything wrong—it’s more about how the EXOS packet capture feature actually works under the hood. Flixtor The built-in capture on EXOS switches is fairly limited compared to something like a full span/mirror session feeding into Wireshark.
In many cases, EXOS captures are restricted to CPU-bound traffic (control plane) rather than full data plane forwarding. That means you’ll mostly see things like ARP, LLDP, STP, or other management/control packets, which would explain why your capture looks “incomplete” or not what you expected.