Hi Community
Some more fabric questions from my Fabric lab.
I have the following setup:
![64d10e9f5b544cb4ac0ee5e9e5c56377_RackMultipart20181101-93167-kg898x-Diagram_inline.png 64d10e9f5b544cb4ac0ee5e9e5c56377_RackMultipart20181101-93167-kg898x-Diagram_inline.png](/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/5513i9A9C8490C53126CD/image-size/large?v=v2&px=999)
All switches in the lab is running the latest 7.1.0.0 GA code.
If I look at the ISIS adjacencies I see that all the adjacencies are active and working:
Core 1:
![64d10e9f5b544cb4ac0ee5e9e5c56377_RackMultipart20181101-64934-1y4i2nh-Adj_1_inline.png 64d10e9f5b544cb4ac0ee5e9e5c56377_RackMultipart20181101-64934-1y4i2nh-Adj_1_inline.png](/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/166iE176414158B96910/image-size/large?v=v2&px=999)
Core 2:
![64d10e9f5b544cb4ac0ee5e9e5c56377_RackMultipart20181101-88235-bpram6-Adj_2_inline.png 64d10e9f5b544cb4ac0ee5e9e5c56377_RackMultipart20181101-88235-bpram6-Adj_2_inline.png](/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/368i157636DE4AAED2DE/image-size/large?v=v2&px=999)
Core 3:
![64d10e9f5b544cb4ac0ee5e9e5c56377_RackMultipart20181101-31690-uffs88-Adj_3_inline.png 64d10e9f5b544cb4ac0ee5e9e5c56377_RackMultipart20181101-31690-uffs88-Adj_3_inline.png](/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/1340iB3BE1BFB3FE2B6AC/image-size/large?v=v2&px=999)
Core 4:
![64d10e9f5b544cb4ac0ee5e9e5c56377_RackMultipart20181101-43160-1mcjgre-Adj_4_inline.png 64d10e9f5b544cb4ac0ee5e9e5c56377_RackMultipart20181101-43160-1mcjgre-Adj_4_inline.png](/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/1139i70E40F11B4001D09/image-size/large?v=v2&px=999)
I now add additional redundant links and have a look at the adjacencies again.
![64d10e9f5b544cb4ac0ee5e9e5c56377_RackMultipart20181101-3902-1sckd2h-Diagram_2_inline.png 64d10e9f5b544cb4ac0ee5e9e5c56377_RackMultipart20181101-3902-1sckd2h-Diagram_2_inline.png](/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/2340i3DC122A0F664F6F0/image-size/large?v=v2&px=999)
Redundant links to or from the VSP 4850's to either another VSP 4850 or VSP 8404 is added to the list but in a backup state. This is expected.
![64d10e9f5b544cb4ac0ee5e9e5c56377_RackMultipart20181101-77000-1pugzu2-Diagram_3_inline.png 64d10e9f5b544cb4ac0ee5e9e5c56377_RackMultipart20181101-77000-1pugzu2-Diagram_3_inline.png](/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/1824i8430ECE08CB1A5FE/image-size/large?v=v2&px=999)
However backup links between the two VSP 8404 nevers passes the
INIT state
![64d10e9f5b544cb4ac0ee5e9e5c56377_RackMultipart20181101-72714-1bode74-Diagram_4_inline.png 64d10e9f5b544cb4ac0ee5e9e5c56377_RackMultipart20181101-72714-1bode74-Diagram_4_inline.png](/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/257i23C80D2842AB4F02/image-size/large?v=v2&px=999)
When I remove the primary links the links that was stuck in "INIT" moves to active.
Both the 48xx and 84xx is running the same code.
Why does the 84xx not move to backup?
Thx