Load Sharing VPLS end

[Julian_Eble]

Hello Community,

I'm having headache about the load-balance on Aggreation Ports.

Our scenery is a MPLS network who the end point are connected by Juniper Routers.
These connections are 10G (20g agg) and have one VLAN VPLS tagged end-by-end.
The traffic doesn't get balanced even when I change the hash-algorithm and the balance type.

Is there any problem using VPLS and LACP?
Extreme introduced the load-sharing VPLS but I think that useful just for the trunk LACP/MPLS, isn't?

Thanks,
Julian Eble

[welisson]

Hi Julian,

send me an email i reply my skype to you
my e-mail is welissontome [@] ig dot com dot br

[Julian_Eble]

Welisson,

I'm nto using mpls between extreme and Juniper.
My main problem right now is the traffic without mpls.
But the traffic is coming by MPLS with VPLS tunnel.

I would like to have your skype to share my labs and try to show you my tests.

[welisson]

Julian,

I'm confused now, so, are you using mpls between extreme and Juniper?

Is it problem happenning over cloud mpls, or just end network without mpls?

[Leonardo_Sambra]

you cannot load balance LDP signaled LSP´s. they must be RSVP signaled if you want to load balance them. although you can load balance a LSP on a LAG but as you have few # of labels the distribution is not good. the workaround is to create more LSP´s to your pseudowire.

[Julian_Eble]

So, between the Juniper and Extreme there's no MPLS involved.
It's just L2, it's a termination of the VPLS.
The traffic are not being calculated in the hash.

But yes, in the backbone I'm using LSP and LDP.