Load Sharing VPLS end
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎04-16-2015 04:08 PM
Hello Community,
I'm having headache about the load-balance on Aggreation Ports.
Our scenery is a MPLS network who the end point are connected by Juniper Routers.
These connections are 10G (20g agg) and have one VLAN VPLS tagged end-by-end.
The traffic doesn't get balanced even when I change the hash-algorithm and the balance type.
Is there any problem using VPLS and LACP?
Extreme introduced the load-sharing VPLS but I think that useful just for the trunk LACP/MPLS, isn't?
Thanks,
Julian Eble
I'm having headache about the load-balance on Aggreation Ports.
Our scenery is a MPLS network who the end point are connected by Juniper Routers.
These connections are 10G (20g agg) and have one VLAN VPLS tagged end-by-end.
The traffic doesn't get balanced even when I change the hash-algorithm and the balance type.
Is there any problem using VPLS and LACP?
Extreme introduced the load-sharing VPLS but I think that useful just for the trunk LACP/MPLS, isn't?
Thanks,
Julian Eble
48 REPLIES 48
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎12-21-2016 12:51 PM
Hi, Henrique,
Sorry, no progress so far. I hope we will get X670-G2 in our lab so I will be able to test some ideas.
BTW, could you please (or anyone from Extreme Networks) look up Broadcom Programmer's Reference Guide for Trident II (II+). I would like to know what packet fields are used in RTAG7 hash on VPLS/MPLS tunnel end.
Sorry, no progress so far. I hope we will get X670-G2 in our lab so I will be able to test some ideas.
BTW, could you please (or anyone from Extreme Networks) look up Broadcom Programmer's Reference Guide for Trident II (II+). I would like to know what packet fields are used in RTAG7 hash on VPLS/MPLS tunnel end.
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎10-18-2016 04:50 PM
Hi Anatoly,
Did you get any progress on this issue?
Did you get any progress on this issue?
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎10-11-2016 09:57 AM
Hi welisson!
Direction of traffic - both; PE01 <--> PE02
Direction of traffic - both; PE01 <--> PE02
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎09-26-2016 01:53 PM
Why don't you split this link and run TE over them?
What is your direction of traffic?
For instance PE01-->PE02 or opposite
What is your direction of traffic?
For instance PE01-->PE02 or opposite
