cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Load Sharing VPLS end

Load Sharing VPLS end

Julian_Eble
New Contributor II
Hello Community,

I'm having headache about the load-balance on Aggreation Ports.

Our scenery is a MPLS network who the end point are connected by Juniper Routers.
These connections are 10G (20g agg) and have one VLAN VPLS tagged end-by-end.
The traffic doesn't get balanced even when I change the hash-algorithm and the balance type.

Is there any problem using VPLS and LACP?
Extreme introduced the load-sharing VPLS but I think that useful just for the trunk LACP/MPLS, isn't?

Thanks,
Julian Eble
48 REPLIES 48

Anatoly_Machekh
New Contributor
Hi welisson,

Yes, I think you mean "l2vpn sharing" feature, and it is enabled on our Extreme switches. And yes, traffic is balanced between LSP from one switch to the other:

Transport LSP : LSP_E1_E2_1 (Configured)
Next Hop I/F : VLAN12
Next Hop Addr : 172.22.127.10 Tx Label : 0x0043b
Tx Pkts : 1213508852 Tx Bytes : 3128993213097
Transport LSP : LSP_E1_E2_2 (Configured)
Next Hop I/F : VLAN12
Next Hop Addr : 172.22.127.10 Tx Label : 0x0043d
Tx Pkts : 598239828 Tx Bytes : 3528005632087
Transport LSP : LSP_E1_E2_3 (Configured)
Next Hop I/F : VLAN12
Next Hop Addr : 172.22.127.10 Tx Label : 0x0043f
Tx Pkts : 401710508 Tx Bytes : 3236292622542
Transport LSP : LSP_E1_E2_4 (Configured)
Next Hop I/F : VLAN12
Next Hop Addr : 172.22.127.10 Tx Label : 0x00441
Tx Pkts : 1034383499 Tx Bytes : 3032407107905
But when switch send traffic to Juniper it puts all traffic in one port in LAG (sharing group) and that is the problem GTAC could not help us with.

welisson
New Contributor III
Hi Anatoly,

I known that x670 family has a feature to enable mpls lsp load-sharing or some thing like that, and using this feature it will do this load balancing in the packets lsp.

it has been provided from x460-G2.[¹]

[¹] https://gtacknowledge.extremenetworks.com/articles/Solution/Unable-to-configure-L2VPN-sharing-with-M...

have you already tried it?

Anatoly_Machekh
New Contributor
Hi All!

At last we got our customers to approve downtime. I configured sharing crc32 (first upper, half an hour later - lower), but result is negative. IP traffic is balancing OK, but L3VPN MPLS - absolutely not.
Anybody has any ideas?

Anatoly_Machekh
New Contributor
Hi Henrique,
Thank you for answer.
We have 2 X670-G2 switches running VPLS between Junipers. On one we have address-based xor balancing, on the other - port-based. Later today I will change address-based balancing to crc32 (will try upper and lower).

Henrique
Extreme Employee
Hi Anatoly, I would suggest you to try using address-based custom algorithm and change the hashing from xor to crc-32 upper or lower.

To try with upper:

configure sharing address-based custom hash-algorithm crc-32 upper

To try with lower:

configure sharing address-based custom hash-algorithm crc-32 lower

Do you have just 1 X670G2 between the Juniper's devices?

If you have 2 X670G2's directly connected, change the hashing for just 1 switch and keep the other with address-based custom algorithm and default hashing (xor).
GTM-P2G8KFN