![9144447642584676bbac3918773090e7_RackMultipart20181023-124378-1is0vh4-X690_X590_Stack_inline.png 9144447642584676bbac3918773090e7_RackMultipart20181023-124378-1is0vh4-X690_X590_Stack_inline.png](/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/1516i42741C0C876BD2ED/image-size/large?v=v2&px=999)
I am working on a design to replace a BD 8806. Looking at what I need and have access too, (2) 690s and (1) 590 seemed like a good option. I ran that through the stacking tool and it still looked good.
What are your thoughts on this?
Do the numbers seem right?
I cannot do (3) 690s because some of the copper ports are 100m.
I cannot do (3) 590s because I need 52 SFP+ ports.
Do all slots still affect the tables, or is it now just master capable slots?