Thursday
Solved! Go to Solution.
Thursday
Hi Anthony,
Long story short, you may be hitting a bug with the way port numbers are displayed, I'd contact GTAC to investigate.
In general, those logs indicate that an ARP entry was learned on one port, then it moved to another. This can happen normally for roaming wifi clients.
The IP of the client is the NEIGH value converted from hex to binary, it may also be backwards. That may just be a quirk of the log message and considered 'normal'.
However, the 0:X port notation is _potentially_ a reference to an internal port or an internal LAG interface. That said, the logs shouldn't display this way, they should show the real port number, and I would consider that a bug in my opinion.
I would speculate that this is not a 'real' issue with client connectivity, but an issue with the log message display regardless.
Friday
Hi
could be a loop sitution.
nr
rmu
Thursday
Hi Anthony,
Long story short, you may be hitting a bug with the way port numbers are displayed, I'd contact GTAC to investigate.
In general, those logs indicate that an ARP entry was learned on one port, then it moved to another. This can happen normally for roaming wifi clients.
The IP of the client is the NEIGH value converted from hex to binary, it may also be backwards. That may just be a quirk of the log message and considered 'normal'.
However, the 0:X port notation is _potentially_ a reference to an internal port or an internal LAG interface. That said, the logs shouldn't display this way, they should show the real port number, and I would consider that a bug in my opinion.
I would speculate that this is not a 'real' issue with client connectivity, but an issue with the log message display regardless.