PVST through SPB

[kbetsis]

Hi all,

What is the recommended way for tackling PVST+ BPDU flooding through a SPB network?

There is a use-case where three (3) switches are connected to two (2) BEBs and PVST+ BPDUs need to:

1. be allowed on the UNI ports

2. be allowed to be flooded through the BEB NNI interconnection of 

PVST+ is needed to offer uplink redundancy to the CISCO switches and have loop avoidance. 

The fabric facing design is the following:

CISCO SWITCH1 --> BEB-SW01 UNI PORT 1
CISCO SWITCH2 --> BEB-SW01 UNI PORT 2

CISCO SWITCH3 --> BEB-SW02 UNI PORT 1

BEB-SW1 NNI PORT X <--> BEB-SW2 NNI PORT X

Each UNI port will have multiple VLANS each mapped to their own ISID.

There are multiple other BEB/BCB switches which currently work for the VLAN-ISID mappings as expected and are pure fabric based.

Any recommendation is more than welcomed.

Thank you

Best Regards

Konstantinos Betsis

[WillyHe]

When there is NO communication required for systems connected to the SPB backbone and the Cisco network, then transparent UNI is the solution.

When communication between the SPB backbone and the Cisco network is required then transparent UNI cannot be used.

[Shaja]

Hi 

I do not think the "fabric care" about it.

Use transparent UNI & those cisco switches will "think" that they are directly connected.        

[kbetsis]

Hi Shaja,

What do you mean transparent UNI? 

The issue is that BPDU frames are dropped on the SPB backbone and this produces loops.

So the issue is that BPDU frames need to traverse the SPB in order to close the loop and at the same time have the mapping to ISID to offer layer 2 services on the same VLANs.