cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

VSP 7200 7.1 - RFC3021

VSP 7200 7.1 - RFC3021

Constantine_Rom
New Contributor II
Does VSP release 7.1 support RFC 3012 - /31 subnet mask.

This is ideal for vIST links and would greatly enable configuration consistency
3 REPLIES 3

EXTR_Paul
Extreme Employee
I see what you mean now. Thanks for your explanation.

I do not know if this is a VOSS limitation or a Broadcom ASIC limitation. While doing some google'ing it would appear that not every vendor supports this, and some vendors don't support it across their entire portfolio.

I recommend contacting your local Extreme SE and perhaps open a ticket with GTAC so we can track the feature.

Constantine_Rom
New Contributor II
When we set up an SPB network, we aim to be consistent with various settings, for instance:

CLIP: 10.10.10.1
MEPID: 1
SPBM Nick: B.E0.01

And so on for .2, .3, .4, etc.

With a /31 mask, we could carry that forward to the vIST as well, which we can't do with a /30.

with a /30, we can have .1 and .2, but the next pair would have to be .5 and .6, instead of .3 and .4, etc.

EXTR_Paul
Extreme Employee
Hi @Constantine Romanos Thanks for contributing.

great question. ..... I heard about this a few years ago. /31 is a slick little subnetting trick.
I was asked this a few years ago and It would appear that VOSS 7.1 or 8.0 does not support RFC 3021.
and I just double checked the factsheets tonight.

But It was only a proposed standard. not a true standard, thus hard to justify to adoption. https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3021


I don't argue that it would be a "nice to have" feature. I would reach out to your local Extreme sales team and inquire about a possible feature request.

I am curious to know your thoughts on how it would enable "Configuration Consistency". I have many large customers, 20,000- to 30,000 user networks. thousands of devices.....they have used /30's for their iST's and vIST's with no issues. IPv4 addresses are cheap.
GTM-P2G8KFN