Real world expected wifi connection speed
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎06-06-2022 09:43 AM
At the moment the bandwidth available compared to a wired connection seems very low. Even when my laptop is the only device on wifi.
For example on Wired I get this from my laptop to a wired server with gbit ports using iperf.
iperf>iperf3 -c w.x.y.z
Connecting to host w.x.y.z, port 5201
[ 4] local A.B.C.D port 1602 connected to w.x.y.z port 5201
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 78.9 MBytes 661 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 1.00-2.00 sec 80.5 MBytes 676 Mbits/sec
On wireless I get this
C:\iperf>iperf3 -c w.x.y.z
Connecting to host w.x.y.z, port 5201
[ 4] local A.B.C.D port 28936 connected to w.x.y.z port 5201
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 4] 0.00-1.00 sec 11.3 MBytes 94.9 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 1.00-2.00 sec 10.8 MBytes 90.3 Mbits/sec
Is this typical ?
Thanks,
Ewan
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎06-07-2022 12:54 PM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎08-08-2022 07:39 AM
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎09-09-2022 02:48 PM
Hi
Really unlikely. You'd need 1024-QAM (WiFi6), 4x4 MIMO, wide channels, no interferences, small distance from AP to client, plus wifi client with same technical capabilities. So it is not what you usually can achieve in real deployment.
If you want to find out what is possible in theory check this one:
https://mcsindex.com/
Keep in mind that theese are theoretical connection rates, not real throughput. Real throughput with a half of wifi connection rate can be considered as normal.
Adam
