Extreme Networks

Harri_Jaakkola · 11-11-2015

Hi, We have a situation where we have identified an interesting issue. We are using Summit X670s (tested both G1 and G2) and want to use static routing with BFD protection, and we also enable iproute sharing to 4 different destinations. However, whe...

Harri_Jaakkola · 11-16-2015

Hi Oscar, Thanks for confirming the problem. Then we believe the design should be questioned, we don’t believe that it should work like this. If you have requested a BFD protection of the route, then the route should be installed only if BFD...

Harri_Jaakkola · 11-12-2015

OK. Thanks for recreating the problem and your ack of bug-candidate. /Harri

Harri_Jaakkola · 11-12-2015

Yes, as I also wrote initally, if we bring the forwarding destination IPs up once, in order for the BFD session to be established once, then it works. The issue is that we want the forwarding sharing to work correctly even if we don't bring them up o...

Extreme Networks

User Statistics

User Activity

Iproute sharing enabled, static routes with BFD is in FIB even if BFD peer is not yet seen

RE: Iproute sharing enabled, static routes with BFD is in FIB even if BFD peer is not yet seen

RE: Iproute sharing enabled, static routes with BFD is in FIB even if BFD peer is not yet seen

RE: Iproute sharing enabled, static routes with BFD is in FIB even if BFD peer is not yet seen