cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

VDX-6740(7.3.0aa) - Extended Out/In ACL : not working as expected

VDX-6740(7.3.0aa) - Extended Out/In ACL : not working as expected

pawarpavan
New Contributor III
Hello Experts,
 
I have configured the below ACL , when I apply it "In" direction then it is working as expected
but if I apply the same ACL  "out" direction then it drops the traffic for the permitted rule even.
 
ip access-list extended Extended_Named
seq 10 permit tcp host 192.168.11.4 gt 80 host 192.168.21.4 gt 80
seq 20 permit tcp host 192.168.11.5 lt 70 host 192.168.21.5 lt 70
seq 30 permit tcp host 192.168.11.6 neq 80 host 192.168.21.6 neq 81
seq 40 permit tcp host 192.168.11.7 range 10 20 host 192.168.21.7 range 10 20
exit
 
If I keep only below a single line in the ACL then it works as per config in both directions (in/out) -
 
ip access-list extended Extended_Named
seq 10 permit tcp host 192.168.11.4 gt 80 host 192.168.21.4 gt 80
exit
 
If I keep only below a single line in the ACL then it works as per config in both directions (in/out)-
 
ip access-list extended Extended_Named
seq 20 permit tcp host 192.168.11.5 lt 70 host 192.168.21.5 lt 70
exit
 
The combination of "gt" & "lt" is also not working as per config, switch drops the seq 20 traffic when it applies in the "out" direction :
 
ip access-list extended Extended_Named
seq 10 permit tcp host 192.168.11.4 gt 80 host 192.168.21.4 gt 80
seq 20 permit tcp host 192.168.11.5 lt 70 host 192.168.21.5 lt 70
exit
 
This is weird behaviour. Please confirm if this is a software bug/defect 
 
Note - If I use "eq" in the port then no issue 
 
-Pavan Pawar
0 REPLIES 0
GTM-P2G8KFN