11-13-2020 05:18 PM
We’re getting ready to refresh a significant number of edge closets and are looking to change up a few things. Our primary goals are:
The current thought is to do something like the following:
The question is, what’s the best way to accomplish the first 3 points following the second two. My initial thought would be to take the two higher-end switches (either 5520s or x465s) and set them up as an MLAG and the lower-end switches (either x440s or v400s) as a “stack” (with the understanding that V400s don’t actually stack and assuming that V400s can be uplinked to an MLAG). This should allow any one of the 3 entities to go down for whatever reason (hopefully just firmware updates) without taking the other 2 down.
Diagram of what I think is a good idea until people tell me why I’m being dumb:
Am I missing anything? I understand that nothing benefits from the MLAG except for the stack and the uplink to the core. Is there a better way to accomplish what I’m after?
11-13-2020 05:34 PM
Correct. If the X440 (I prefer them over V400) Stack is connected via MLAG to “Closet-Switches” it will stay online if you reboot the “closet-switches” one by one (e.g. for an firmware upgrade)
I don’t think that you can connect one WAP to both switches because, they all have only one PoE-Port afaik (and offer only one MultiGig Port) So you don’t have any high-availability for your access-points.
To reduce the downtime during a hardware failure, reboot, firmware upgrade… you might have to distribute the WAPs evenly on both switches, so that the users always have two WAPs near them, each on a different switch.