ESRP vs VRRP

[EtherNation_Use]

Create Date: Sep 20 2012 2:40PM

Hopefully you can see the pic? (forum wouldn't accept it)

As you (hopefully ;)) can see i have 2x670's as a core and MLAG'd links to cabinets, (SOME Cabinets are not MLAG'd and are just linked to 1 x670 until next budget)

I want to use the x670's for layer 3 / ip routing. should i use esrp or vrrp. I think esrp is not possible as the member vlan ports get disabled on the slave switch, or am i wrong here.

any way let me know your thoughts please. any questions

http://www.anony.ws/i/2012/09/20/LKDza.png
(from conrad_jones)

[EtherNation_Use]

Create Date: Apr 30 2013 6:59PM

Quick question I also see the multicast on any machine on that VLAN is that right? i think it is only necessary between the switches and this blocks it between them anyway so can i just block the broadcast completely? or am i missing something here.didn't really think about the broadcast until i was wiresharking some machines to troubleshoot an internet problem. (from conrad_jones)

[EtherNation_Use]

Create Date: Apr 1 2013 1:15PM

Hey oxide54

The only requirements for the Priority is to not set it to 255. Also remember this is for 15.2 and higher code and do not set the VIP to either actual IP addresses on the VLANs.

Let me know if there are any more questions.

Thanks
P (from Paul_Russo)

[EtherNation_Use]

Create Date: Mar 31 2013 8:11PM

hi prussodoes the prioriy of the vrrp matter if i use this acl?oxide54 (from conrad_jones)

[EtherNation_Use]

Create Date: Mar 8 2013 2:03PM

hi prusso,

Can you inform me if the Active-Active VRRP is already available??

Thank you.

Best Regards,

G (from gondu)