How to configure EAPS with CFM/OAM?
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎05-10-2016 04:42 AM
How can I configure CFM/OAM basicly between 2 switches and together with EAPS for faster ring recovery, when I have a thrid-party switch in ring?
I read user/concept guide, command reference guide and older ENA/ENS Guides, but this doesn't help my.
Can some post a list of commands I need to use?
I read user/concept guide, command reference guide and older ENA/ENS Guides, but this doesn't help my.
Can some post a list of commands I need to use?
17 REPLIES 17
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎06-23-2016 12:42 PM
Whats the best way for faster ring-restore than default, if a 3rd party switch is in ring?
Using CFM OR modifing hello-paket-send sequence and setting failtime-expiry action?
Using CFM OR modifing hello-paket-send sequence and setting failtime-expiry action?
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎05-13-2016 04:50 AM
Thanks Erik,
youre right...
but "enable cfm" isn't available. 😉
youre right...
configure cfm domain "eaps" association "eaps-cfm" ports 24 end-point down ccm disablethat was the problem on the x460g1...on my x440g1 it was enabled by default...
but "enable cfm" isn't available. 😉
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎05-12-2016 12:50 PM
Is your third party switch configured to pass the control vlans for your two rings through tagged ?? I would make sure you get two complete healthy rings first with no CFM in play then add the CFM config
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎05-12-2016 12:50 PM
Yes, EAPS and CFM should first be implemented and verified independently.
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎05-12-2016 07:03 AM
Hi,
I tested in my Lab, without sucsess.
One Ring is in failed state and the other is "Links-Down".
The Ports on both Switches has primary port in one ring and secondary port in other ring to the 3rd party device (in my lab a D2-Switch) and on the other side the ports for the rings are crosswise to the first...
Is it possible, that end-point "down" is the wrong state in my case...
Here a quick design-map:
I tested in my Lab, without sucsess.
One Ring is in failed state and the other is "Links-Down".
The Ports on both Switches has primary port in one ring and secondary port in other ring to the 3rd party device (in my lab a D2-Switch) and on the other side the ports for the rings are crosswise to the first...
Is it possible, that end-point "down" is the wrong state in my case...
Here a quick design-map:
