cancel
Showing results forĀ 
Search instead forĀ 
Did you mean:Ā 

Kern.Alert>CPU 1 Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 0000000000000000, epc == 0000000000000000, ra == ffffffffc057a1b0

Kern.Alert>CPU 1 Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 0000000000000000, epc == 0000000000000000, ra == ffffffffc057a1b0

Rod_Robertson2
Contributor
Crit:Kern.Alert> CPU 1 Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 0000000000000000, epc == 0000000000000000, ra == ffffffffc057a1b0

We have an X480-48X switch , we have changed the hardware by RMA and upgraded the code to the advised level ( previous 16.1.3.6-patch1-11 ), we have had a TAC case open, even with this we are still seeing ramdom reboots.

Full version :

xpctRebootDtect> Booting after System Failure.03/15/2017 15:41:41.84 Changing to watchdog warm reset mode
03/15/2017 15:39:52.13 CPU 1: Kernel thread was stuck for 3.05 seconds, jiffies: 4435977008
03/15/2017 15:39:52.13 CPU 0: Kernel thread was stuck for 2.85 seconds, jiffies: 4435976997
03/15/2017 15:39:52.13 Fatal exception: panic in 5 seconds
03/15/2017 15:39:52.12 CPU 1 Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 0000000000000000, epc == 0000000000000000, ra == ffffffffc057a1b0

This unit is configured as a Supervlan , and is internet facing.
Prior to this I did see in the log a number of outside attempts to access the switch management , this was stopped by our Access-policy.
8 REPLIES 8

Erik_Bais
New Contributor
Could this also happen with EAPS config's ?

Rod_Robertson2
Contributor
The switch configuration has now been modified so that all sub vlans are in the same VR as the super vlan .. we will continue to monitor and see if the switch reboots again without warning.

Rod_Robertson2
Contributor
We do have a basic miss configured Supervlan ( in different VR's ) its historical , and we are trying to address this .. the swicth was stable for years ( well 2 ) then we started to see these random reboots ..

Sumit_Tokle
Contributor
Note to TAC:

TAC needs to check if there is any invalid pointer present in SuperVlan's code that is trying to access invalid address. In the error message there is also the stack, take a look at it in order to identify where is the error.
GTM-P2G8KFN