Kern.Alert>CPU 1 Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 0000000000000000, epc == 0000000000000000, ra == ffffffffc057a1b0
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎03-16-2017 03:48 PM
Crit:Kern.Alert> CPU 1 Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 0000000000000000, epc == 0000000000000000, ra == ffffffffc057a1b0
We have an X480-48X switch , we have changed the hardware by RMA and upgraded the code to the advised level ( previous 16.1.3.6-patch1-11 ), we have had a TAC case open, even with this we are still seeing ramdom reboots.
Full version :
xpctRebootDtect> Booting after System Failure.03/15/2017 15:41:41.84 Changing to watchdog warm reset mode
03/15/2017 15:39:52.13 CPU 1: Kernel thread was stuck for 3.05 seconds, jiffies: 4435977008
03/15/2017 15:39:52.13 CPU 0: Kernel thread was stuck for 2.85 seconds, jiffies: 4435976997
03/15/2017 15:39:52.13 Fatal exception: panic in 5 seconds
03/15/2017 15:39:52.12 CPU 1 Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 0000000000000000, epc == 0000000000000000, ra == ffffffffc057a1b0
This unit is configured as a Supervlan , and is internet facing.
Prior to this I did see in the log a number of outside attempts to access the switch management , this was stopped by our Access-policy.
We have an X480-48X switch , we have changed the hardware by RMA and upgraded the code to the advised level ( previous 16.1.3.6-patch1-11 ), we have had a TAC case open, even with this we are still seeing ramdom reboots.
Full version :
xpctRebootDtect> Booting after System Failure.03/15/2017 15:41:41.84
03/15/2017 15:39:52.13
03/15/2017 15:39:52.13
03/15/2017 15:39:52.13
03/15/2017 15:39:52.12
This unit is configured as a Supervlan , and is internet facing.
Prior to this I did see in the log a number of outside attempts to access the switch management , this was stopped by our Access-policy.
8 REPLIES 8
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎03-16-2017 09:18 PM
Rod, I think you should share the dmesg o/p with TAC engineer to further troubleshoot issue. It seems the issue you were facing in old version is not resolved in new version tool
Looking at above o/p it's difficult to understand why code is referencing at VA 0000000000000000, epc == 0000000000000000
Looking at above o/p it's difficult to understand why code is referencing at VA 0000000000000000, epc == 0000000000000000
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎03-16-2017 05:05 PM
Sorry Rod,
I missed this information...my bad.
Let me look into it for you.
I missed this information...my bad.
Let me look into it for you.
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎03-16-2017 04:25 PM
Hello Rod,
What switch and version?
What switch and version?
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎03-16-2017 04:25 PM
Sorry for the delay X480-48X
16.1.3.6-patch1-11 ( as advised by original TAC case )
16.1.3.6-patch1-11 ( as advised by original TAC case )
