cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Provide support for stacking nomenclature when not stacked

Provide support for stacking nomenclature when not stacked

Eric_Burke
New Contributor III

Maybe it’s there and I’m missing it. I would LOVE to have EXOS give you an option to use stacking nomenclature on non-stacked switches! We enable stacking all of the time, just to keep our configs consistent regardless of the environment we’re in. The problem is that we lose the stacking ports (especially in SFP+ stacked environments). It would be so much easier if you could always just treat the first unstacked switch as SLOT1 (even when by itself). Anyone else find this a bit annoying? Seems like it would be a fairly simple fix...

14 REPLIES 14

BradP
Extreme Employee

I think there is one exception: X770. It doesn't support 30.x at all, but 22.x

ooo. Good point. Thanks for the correction.

Stefan_K_
Valued Contributor

I think there is one exception: X770. It doesn't support 30.x at all, but 22.x

BradP
Extreme Employee

Hey David,

Nope. This is 30.2 and above only. FYI, any device that can run 22.x can run 30.2.

 

Brad

davidj_cogliane
Contributor

This is a supper cool addition, I have wanted this for years for the same reasons. 

Does this happen to exist in the 22.x line? I will be checking when I finish the class I am in.

If it is I will really need to make it over to see you guys the next time I am down in Charlotte for the beer. 

GTM-P2G8KFN