Use any controller for 10 Ap 7161 vs 5 Ap 7562
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎07-07-2017 03:29 AM
Hi everybody
I have 10 Ap7161 and 5 Ap7562 use wing 5.8, What controller do I have to use?
Thank you
I have 10 Ap7161 and 5 Ap7562 use wing 5.8, What controller do I have to use?
Thank you
15 REPLIES 15
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎07-07-2017 04:35 AM
Any plans to change this like Aruba? Adopt different kind of APs works with Aruba Instant. What changed is the problem of one AP have the configuration and not all:
This works with WiNG 5.9.0.
- Dynamic VC – Provides redundancy in the case of VC (AP) failure. Dynamic VC enables an AP to take on the role of VC when it is elected as RF-domain manager. Supports explicit secondary IP address configuration for seamless management access.
This works with WiNG 5.9.0.
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎07-07-2017 04:35 AM
The downside to a VC in this case is that as of today, it cannot adopt dissimilar APs. The VC will not resolve the roaming disconnect issue on a routed network. A hardware controller is required. Here's some information on VC adoption on a routed network:
https://gtacknowledge.extremenetworks.com/articles/Solution/Not-able-to-adopt-WiNG-Express-APs-to-a-...
https://gtacknowledge.extremenetworks.com/articles/Solution/Not-able-to-adopt-WiNG-Express-APs-to-a-...
Christoph S.
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎07-07-2017 04:35 AM
If you are using VC, then VC will in charge of the roaming, but I never try 7161 work with 7562 before because of 7161 is really old product.
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎07-07-2017 04:35 AM
Hello Tuan,
For this deployment size you might also want to look at the RFS4000: https://cloud.kapostcontent.net/pub/6df18969-455c-403d-942e-885e210d861b/rfs-4000-data-sheet.pdf?kui...
If you are looking for a hardware controller then your options would be either the NX5500 or RFS4000.
In regards to your roaming question, there are 2 scenarios to consider as follows:
1 - All APs are in the same broadcast domain (layer 2): Roaming will be seamless between APs (no dropped connections) in the absence of a controller.
2 - APs are in different broadcast domains on a routed network (layer 3): There will be a slight disconnect when roaming between APs in different broadcast domains in the absence of a controller. In this case a controller is needed should seamless roaming be a requirement.
Regards,
Chris
For this deployment size you might also want to look at the RFS4000: https://cloud.kapostcontent.net/pub/6df18969-455c-403d-942e-885e210d861b/rfs-4000-data-sheet.pdf?kui...
If you are looking for a hardware controller then your options would be either the NX5500 or RFS4000.
In regards to your roaming question, there are 2 scenarios to consider as follows:
1 - All APs are in the same broadcast domain (layer 2): Roaming will be seamless between APs (no dropped connections) in the absence of a controller.
2 - APs are in different broadcast domains on a routed network (layer 3): There will be a slight disconnect when roaming between APs in different broadcast domains in the absence of a controller. In this case a controller is needed should seamless roaming be a requirement.
Regards,
Chris
Christoph S.
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎07-07-2017 04:35 AM
If I do not use the controller, roaming when the client moves between different APs (7161 vs 7562) will lose the connection?
Thanks
Thanks
