Best Stacking Topology Between X770 and X670
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎06-15-2017 02:13 AM
Hi,
Which one is better of following?
1. Stacking with SummitStack-320 for all of two X770 and two X670 where Master configured only for one of two X770
2. Two X770 and two X670 stacked separately with SummitStack-160 and connect both stacks with bonded 4x 40GbE link
Best regards,
Which one is better of following?
1. Stacking with SummitStack-320 for all of two X770 and two X670 where Master configured only for one of two X770
2. Two X770 and two X670 stacked separately with SummitStack-160 and connect both stacks with bonded 4x 40GbE link
Best regards,
8 REPLIES 8
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎06-18-2017 07:12 AM
Hi Alexandr,
Connecting all switches on single SummitStack-320 or having all switches on separate SummitStack-160 with 4x 40G bonded connection between both stacks will consume same port number. So, which one is better?
Best regards,
Connecting all switches on single SummitStack-320 or having all switches on separate SummitStack-160 with 4x 40G bonded connection between both stacks will consume same port number. So, which one is better?
Best regards,
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎06-18-2017 07:12 AM
Hi!
It's depends from your topology, type of traffic and etc.
Thank you!
It's depends from your topology, type of traffic and etc.
Thank you!
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎06-16-2017 02:12 AM
Hi Andrew,
I really understand about that table but I still don't get it in relation to my question. My main question is about to see if separating two X770 and two X670V/X670-G2 into two stacks is better or worst idea than connecting them all into single stack since all of them support SummitStack-320 and SummitStack-160.
Best regards,
I really understand about that table but I still don't get it in relation to my question. My main question is about to see if separating two X770 and two X670V/X670-G2 into two stacks is better or worst idea than connecting them all into single stack since all of them support SummitStack-320 and SummitStack-160.
Best regards,
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎06-16-2017 02:12 AM
Hi!
It's depends from your goals.
If you need more ports - then it can be single stack.
If you need more performance - you need separate stacks (In case - stack X770 with X670V).
If stack X770 with X670-G2 - you can use single stack.
If stack X770 with X670-V - you can see stack performance degradation
You can check this in https://stackingtool.extremenetworks.com/StackingTool/
Thank you!
It's depends from your goals.
If you need more ports - then it can be single stack.
If you need more performance - you need separate stacks (In case - stack X770 with X670V).
If stack X770 with X670-G2 - you can use single stack.
If stack X770 with X670-V - you can see stack performance degradation
You can check this in https://stackingtool.extremenetworks.com/StackingTool/
Thank you!
