09-28-2021 12:46 PM
Hi everybody,
As I was designing a SPBm architecture, a question occurred to me: in a such SPBm deployment (see below), is it possible to aggregate links ? I know its possible to aggregate IS-IS links between two same devices, but what’s about vIST/SMLT setups ?
Is IS-IS the sole in charge of distributing i-sid flows between b-vlans and further between links ?
Solved! Go to Solution.
09-28-2021 01:15 PM
Hello,
You CANNOT aggregate FC (Fabric Connect) links between a stand-alone device and an SPBM/SMLT cluster (siteA and siteB).
You CANNOT aggregate FC connections between two SPBM/SMLT clusters.
You CAN aggregate FA (Fabric Attach) links between a stand alone device and an SPBM/SMLT cluster.
If you are concerned about load balancing, traffic between a FC stand alone device and an SPBM/SMLT cluster is following the shortest path and usually there is an equal cost for both paths to the SPBM/SMLT cluster and so traffic will be load balanced (if you have configured two backbone vlan’s.
regards
WillyHe
09-28-2021 01:29 PM
Thanks for your response WillyHe, its a confirmation of what I had understood.
Best regards,
Rodjeur70
09-28-2021 01:15 PM
Hello,
You CANNOT aggregate FC (Fabric Connect) links between a stand-alone device and an SPBM/SMLT cluster (siteA and siteB).
You CANNOT aggregate FC connections between two SPBM/SMLT clusters.
You CAN aggregate FA (Fabric Attach) links between a stand alone device and an SPBM/SMLT cluster.
If you are concerned about load balancing, traffic between a FC stand alone device and an SPBM/SMLT cluster is following the shortest path and usually there is an equal cost for both paths to the SPBM/SMLT cluster and so traffic will be load balanced (if you have configured two backbone vlan’s.
regards
WillyHe