replaced our x460GE10 test unit with new X460G4. Deleted old entry. Added new entry using the same ip as the g10 had. The new unit responds to snmpv3 queries from other managers. In SE it shows "status only" under the License banner and not onbo...
We have a very fluid environment when it comes to port to vlan assignment. I see that using the command " enable ip-security dhcp-snooping vlan STUDENT_ITTSTAFF_849 ports all violation-action drop-packet block-port duration 15" enables dhcp-snoopin...
I am not able to clear the violation entry. I've tried " clear ip-security dhcp-snooping entries vlan STUDENT_ITTSTAFF_849" and "clear ip-security dhcp-snooping entries STUDENT_ITTSTAFF_849 ports 5" Neither works. M_RM_4277_SW_TES_EX.dccc.edu....
Question on prempt timing. Our VRRP is configured the same between two S Cores . Each closet (25) have 6 vlans / 6 vrrp instances running to each.If my understanding is correct the Master advertisement is (default) one every 1 sec. 1) Does the ba...
Christopher, Another team member that I work closely with brought this anomaly up to our team members that handle the authentication part of this. They are responsible for the radius setup. The radius admin did make a change in the radius confi...
Is a TLC script possible naming the vlans using wildcards such as Employee_* or Student_* to define the vlan to set all ports to snooping. Example of a vlan would be "Student_4277 or Employee_4311
Once the port is placed in the violations list show ip-security dhcp-snooping violations STUDENT_ITTSTAFF_849Port Violating MAC5 c0:3e:ba:4c:47:64The only way I found to remove it was to "disable ip-security dhcp-snooping v...
This is a x460 code ExtremeXOS version 31.6.2.1This is a test switch that we are configuring before mass deployment to the existing network.1) I removed the test device from the port 5 so there is no link on port 5 now 2) Disabled the port. 3) Ran ...
I am testing on a trunk port of a C3 which is connected to a downstream user switch before trying on the cores “S” Series trunk ports. Although it appears to be attached to the ports the deny services do not function. What am I missing. This was ...
