VOSS LLDP-MED with Mitel Phone
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎10-21-2021 02:49 PM
Trying to get this to work, but no luck so far. I have 2 separate VLANs for data and voice. On the VSP port, the data VLAN is default and untagged. I have also configured 2 commands for LLDP-MED to get the Mitel onto the voice VLAN. However, the phone is still landing on the data VLAN. The LLDP-MED commands used on the interface are:
lldp med-network-policies voice tagging tagged vlan-id 1121
lldp med-network-policies voice-signaling tagging tagged vlan-id 1121
#show lldp med-network-policies
************************************************************************************
Command Execution Time: Thu Oct 21 13:47:35 2021 CDT
************************************************************************************
==========================================================================================
LLDP-MED Network Policies
==========================================================================================
Port Application Type VlanID Tagging DSCP Priority
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1/9 Voice 1121 Tagged 46 0
1/9 Voice Signaling 1121 Tagged 0 0
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As a follow up question, does anyone know the difference between the policy types? That being {guest-voice | guest-voice-signaling | etc..}.
lldp med-network-policies voice tagging tagged vlan-id 1121
lldp med-network-policies voice-signaling tagging tagged vlan-id 1121
#show lldp med-network-policies
************************************************************************************
Command Execution Time: Thu Oct 21 13:47:35 2021 CDT
************************************************************************************
==========================================================================================
LLDP-MED Network Policies
==========================================================================================
Port Application Type VlanID Tagging DSCP Priority
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1/9 Voice 1121 Tagged 46 0
1/9 Voice Signaling 1121 Tagged 0 0
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As a follow up question, does anyone know the difference between the policy types? That being {guest-voice | guest-voice-signaling | etc..}.
7 REPLIES 7
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎10-22-2021 10:57 AM
Followed the steps at the link below, but that did not work.
https://extremeportal.force.com/ExtrArticleDetail?an=000099587
https://extremeportal.force.com/ExtrArticleDetail?an=000099587
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎10-22-2021 11:17 AM
I can get this to work with the "auto-sense" feature, but we have locations with more than 1 voice VLAN so we really need to be able to define this per port.
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎10-25-2021 02:42 AM
The idea of auto-sense is to be able to remove any per port configuration and let auto-sense take care of the device assignments automatically. If a global voice vlan for auto-sense does not work for you, then I suggest to either use NAC to assign a voice vlan to the phones via Radius or, then you take the port out of auto-sense (no auto-sense enable convert-to-config) and then adjust the voice vlan manually. This can be done on any port individually. I recommend to use 8.4.2 as there are additional capabilities that will simplify per port assignments.
I hope this helps.
Roger
I hope this helps.
Roger
Options
- Mark as New
- Bookmark
- Subscribe
- Mute
- Subscribe to RSS Feed
- Get Direct Link
- Report Inappropriate Content
‎10-26-2021 10:43 AM
When I got this working with the auto-sense I did try the convert to config. At that point I removed the auto-config voice vlan and that broke it. If it is converted to a config on an interface I would think it should no longer rely on a global setting, right?
