07-07-2021 05:06 AM
I deploy an aerohive ap on a public space, and choose 36 channel(width 80Mhz). If the other guy deploy anohter ap(802.11 ac2 ) neaby and choose 44 channle(width 160Mhz), does this two channel interference with each other?
Solved! Go to Solution.
07-12-2021 03:09 PM
Hi,
Yes, they will. The sort of issue you may experience is overlapping BSS, where primary channels are more strict about clear channel assessment than secondary channels from what I remember. That means, you may end up with lots of traffic on wide channel secondary part bursting lot of MCS data not caring much about what’s going on this channel as another AP’s primary. It would be better to keep them off on the spectrum or - if they need to overlap - keep their primary channels the same. You will split your channel capacity in half but it’s better. Is that wide channel really needed? In enterprise I’d aim to remain 20 MHz or go into 40 MHz depending on the radio environment size and density.
More:
https://www.mikealbano.com/2015/10/channelization-obss-impact.html
https://divdyn.com/wi-fi-throughput/
Hope that helps,
Tomasz
07-13-2021 01:48 AM
base on the image you posted, If choose 40Mhz channel width, then the center point of channel should be 38, 46… 151, 159 etc, but here is the result of `show acsp`
Interface Channel select state Primary channel Channel width Power ctrl state Tx power(dbm) Use Last Selection
--------- --------------------- ---------------- ------------- --------------------- ------------- ---------------------
Wifi0 Disable(Link down) Down 20 Disable(Link down) Down Channel:No Power:No
Wifi1 Enable 157 40 Enable 14 Channel:No Power:No
the channel is 157, how to determine if 157 is bonding with 161 or 153?
07-12-2021 03:32 PM
P.S. According to your question in the topic, please try to avoid reusing same 20 MHz channel or overlapping bonded channels as long as it is possible:
Grabbed the above image from the interwebz.
Cheers,
Tomasz
07-12-2021 03:09 PM
Hi,
Yes, they will. The sort of issue you may experience is overlapping BSS, where primary channels are more strict about clear channel assessment than secondary channels from what I remember. That means, you may end up with lots of traffic on wide channel secondary part bursting lot of MCS data not caring much about what’s going on this channel as another AP’s primary. It would be better to keep them off on the spectrum or - if they need to overlap - keep their primary channels the same. You will split your channel capacity in half but it’s better. Is that wide channel really needed? In enterprise I’d aim to remain 20 MHz or go into 40 MHz depending on the radio environment size and density.
More:
https://www.mikealbano.com/2015/10/channelization-obss-impact.html
https://divdyn.com/wi-fi-throughput/
Hope that helps,
Tomasz